Political and governance experts have expressed mixed views over the record number of presidential candidates cleared to contest Malawi’s upcoming elections, with some warning that the crowded field could undermine the electoral process.

The Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) approved 17 aspirants while disqualifying three others for failing to meet nomination requirements.  While acknowledging that the high number of candidates reflects a vibrant political democracy, the Political Scientists Association of Malawi (PSAM) argues it also signals weak political consolidation.  

“On one hand, such a large pool of contestants demonstrates healthy political participation,” said PSAM publicity secretary Mavuto Bamusi. “However, it equally points to a worrying lack of cohesion, as mature democracies tend to have fewer but more structured political options.” 

Echoing these concerns, Benedicto Kondowe, chairperson of the Civil Society Elections Integrity Forum, noted that many of the approved candidates lack clear policy platforms, which could dilute the quality of democratic debate.  

“A crowded race does not necessarily strengthen democracy—especially when many contenders offer little beyond symbolic participation,” Kondowe said. “This could lead to voter confusion and fragmented opposition support, ultimately distorting election outcomes.”  

However, MEC Director of Media and Public Relations Sangwani Mwafulirwa defended the commission’s vetting process, stating that all approved candidates met the legal requirements.  

The electoral body is expected to release the final list of candidates for presidential, parliamentary, and local council positions on 8 August.